Omeopatia:
la prima medicina sperimentale moderna
 

Su 1016 pazienti con malattie respiratorie acute l'Antroposofia è più efficace della medicina convenzionale ed ha meno eventi avversi posted on 19-04-2007

Studio condotto su 1016 pazienti con malattie respiratorie acute curati con l'antroposofia (715)  o con la medicina convenzionale (301). L'antroposofia si è dimostrata più efficace, ed i pazienti hanno avuto la metà degli eventi avversi rispetto ala medicina convenzionale, assumendo meno antibiotici


Notizia, adattamento e commento a cura di Andrea Valeri, responsabile del Dipartimento di ricerca clinica della Società Italiana di Medicina Omeopatica.  avaleri11@libero.it

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005 Apr;117(7-8):256-68.


Anthroposophic vs. conventional therapy of acute respiratory and ear infections: a prospective outcomes study.

Hamre HJ, Fischer M, Heger M, Riley D, Haidvogl M, Baars E, Bristol E, Evans M,

Schwarz R, Kiene H.Institute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology, Freiburg, Germany.harald.hamre@ifaemm.de


CONTEXT: Acute respiratory and ear symptoms are frequently treated with

antibiotics. Anthroposophic treatment of these symptoms relies primarily on

anthroposophic medications. OBJECTIVE: To compare anthroposophic treatment to

conventional treatment of acute respiratory and ear symptoms regarding clinical

outcome, medication use and safety, and patient satisfaction. DESIGN:

Prospective, non-randomised comparison of outcomes in patients self-selected to

anthroposophic or conventional therapy under real-world conditions. SETTING: 29

primary care practices in Austria, Germany, Netherlands, UK, and USA.


PARTICIPANTS AND THERAPY: 1016 consecutive outpatients aged > or = 1 month,

consulting an anthroposophic (n = 715 A-patients) or conventional physician (n =

301 C-patients) with a chief complaint of acute (< or = 7 days) sore throat, ear

pain, sinus pain, runny nose or cough. Patients were treated according to the

physician's discretion.


PRIMARY OUTCOME: Patients' self-report of treatment

outcome (complete recovery/major improvement/slight to moderate improvement/no

change/deterioration) at Day 14. RESULTS: Most common chief complaints were

cough (39.9% of A-patients vs. 33.9% of C-patients, p = 0.0772), sore throat

(26.3% vs. 23.3%, p=0.3436), and ear pain (20.0% vs. 18.9%, p=0.7302). Baseline

chief complaint severity was severe or very severe in 60.5% of A-patients and

53.3% of C-patients (p=0.0444), mean severity (0-4) of complaint-related

symptoms was 1.3 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.6 (p=0.5197). During the 28-day follow-up

antibiotics were prescribed to 5.5% of A-patients and 33.6% of C-patients

(p<0.0001), anthroposophic medicines were prescribed to all A-patients and no

C-patient.

OUTCOMES: Improvement within 24 hours occurred in 30.9% (221/715) of

A-patients and 16.6% (50/301) of C-patients (p<0.0001), improvement within 3

days in 73.1% and 57.1% (p<0.0001). At Day 7 complete recovery or major

improvement was reported by 77.1% of A-patients and 66.1% of C-patients

(p=0.0004), at Day 14 by 89.7% and 84.4% (p=0.0198). Complete recovery rates at

Day 7 were 30.5% and 23.3% (p<0.0001); at Day 14 they were 64.2% and 49.5%

(p<0.0001). 69.9% of A-patients and 60.5% of C-patients were very satisfied with

their physician (p=0.0043); 95.7% and 83.4% would choose the same therapy again

for their chief complaint (p<0.0001). After adjustment for country, gender, age,

chief complaint, duration of complaint, previous episode of complaint within

last year, and baseline symptom severity, odds ratios favoured the A-group for

all these outcomes. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 2.7% of A-patients

and 6.0% of C-patients (p=0.0157).


CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional treatment, anthroposophic treatment of primary care patients with acute respiratory and ear symptoms had more favourable outcomes, lower antibiotic prescription rates, less adverse drug reactions, and higher patient satisfaction.

link all' Abstract:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=15926617&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum 

 


 

Cerca un omeopata accreditatoTrova un omeopata accreditato vicino a te

Registro Italiano dei Medici
e Veterinari Omeopati Accreditati
Iscriviti al registro Sei un medico o un veterinario e pratichi la Medicina Omeopatica?
Chiedi l'iscrizione al Registro Italiano dei Medici e Veterinari Omeopati accreditati.

Attenzione Evidence
[10.07.2019] Homeopathy and depression - Positive evidence collection
Omeopatia e depressione - Raccolta bibliografica delle evidenze positive
[08.06.2019] Evidence Based Yoga: osteoporosi e disturbi cognitivi - Teis (Bz)
[11.05.2019] L'efficacia dell'Omeopatia: evidenze e sviluppi
[03.12.2018] Appello per uno STOP all'ingiustificato ed antiscientifico attacco contro i medici omeopati